- AutorIn
- Ringo Baumann
- Titel
- Metalogical Contributions to the Nonmonotonic Theory of Abstract Argumentation
- Zitierfähige Url:
- https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-132973
- Datum der Einreichung
- 17.10.2013
- Datum der Verteidigung
- 21.01.2014
- Abstract (EN)
- The study of nonmonotonic logics is one mayor field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). The reason why such kind of formalisms are so attractive to model human reasoning is that they allow to withdraw former conclusion. At the end of the 1980s the novel idea of using argumentation to model nonmonotonic reasoning emerged in AI. Nowadays argumentation theory is a vibrant research area in AI, covering aspects of knowledge representation, multi-agent systems, and also philosophical questions. Phan Minh Dung’s abstract argumentation frameworks (AFs) play a dominant role in the field of argumentation. In AFs arguments and attacks between them are treated as primitives, i.e. the internal structure of arguments is not considered. The major focus is on resolving conflicts. To this end a variety of semantics have been defined, each of them specifying acceptable sets of arguments, so-called extensions, in a particular way. Although, Dung-style AFs are among the simplest argumentation systems one can think of, this approach is still powerful. It can be seen as a general theory capturing several nonmonotonic formalisms as well as a tool for solving well-known problems as the stable-marriage problem. This thesis is mainly concerned with the investigation of metalogical properties of Dung’s abstract theory. In particular, we provide cardinality, monotonicity and splitting results as well as characterization theorems for equivalence notions. The established results have theoretical and practical gains. On the one hand, they yield deeper theoretical insights into how this nonmonotonic theory works, and on the other the obtained results can be used to refine existing algorithms or even give rise to new computational procedures. A further main part is the study of problems regarding dynamic aspects of abstract argumentation. Most noteworthy we solve the so-called enforcing and the more general minimal change problem for a huge number of semantics.
- Freie Schlagwörter (DE)
- nicht-monotone Logik, argumentation
- Freie Schlagwörter (EN)
- nonmonotonic logics, abstract argumentation, metalogical analysis
- Klassifikation (DDC)
- 500
- GutachterIn
- Prof. Dr. Gerhard Brewka
- Prof. Dr. Pietro Baroni
- BetreuerIn
- Prof. Dr. Gerhard Brewka
- Den akademischen Grad verleihende / prüfende Institution
- Leipzig University, Leipzig
- URN Qucosa
- urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-132973
- Veröffentlichungsdatum Qucosa
- 03.02.2014
- Dokumenttyp
- Dissertation
- Sprache des Dokumentes
- Englisch